6/30/2026

Will This Movie Make You Doubt Your Faith?


A few posts ago I wrote about Disclosure Day, Steven Spielberg's latest movie. I speculated about the kind of story we would be getting and it's messages. Now that the movie has been released, I think my predictions were accurate, but there were a few extra things I didn't expect. 

For example, I thought DD was going to have a large cultural impact, but now its likely to be considered one of Spielberg's worst movies (together with Ready Player One and The Crystal Skull). Many people from both mainstream conservative and normie sectors are saying the film was a disappointment and is full of terrible plot holes. I also noticed many people know the movie is just a psyop. 

This leads me to conclude that in the long run, Disclosure Day isn't going to be the most important Blue Beam movie, unless it becomes a cult classic in a few years.

Having said this, I would like to share my thoughts about the film, which is indeed full of very interesting propaganda. Today, on the Pasture of Knowledge, we will see what kind of secrets Spielberg has disclosed for us. 


Movie Synopsis


We are introduced to David Carnell, a mathematical genius who has stolen alien tech and a few videos about UFOs from Wardex, a heavily subsidized corporation.

Carnell's girlfriend Jane is held by them to convince Carnell to give up the items. Math-Guy tricks them by pretending to give up the items and then escapes. He then contacts his ally, Hugo Wakefield, and asks if he should release the files online; Wakefield thinks it's a bad idea and instructs him to return to base.

Meanwhile, TV reporter Margaret Fairchild receives a visit from a cardinal bird, who awakens within her psychic powers. Fairchild is scared because she doesn't understand what her telepathy means, and during a weather report she grunts coca cola noises and scares everyone. Noah Scanlon, Wardex's owner, sees this. He recognizes the language of the aliens and decides it's time to target her too. 

Meanwhile, Carnell shows the footage to Jane. She is moved to pity, because the aliens were tortured by Wardex; however, she objects to the disclosure because she thinks people will loose their faith. Despite being a former nun, Jane thinks faith is important for society and doesn't want to loose it. 

Carnell goes to a wheat field and sees the coca cola noises video. He is also able to understand the language and feels scared. As Fairchild grunts, circles form on the wheat field. Carnell doesn't know he is one of the chosen ones yet. 

Noah Scanlon wants to kill Carnell, and so he uses alien technology to posses Jane. He starts taking control of her. Panicking, Jane holds her Crucifix very strongly until she injures herself. The pain drives Scanlon away. 

Fairchild, who is being persecuted by the men in black, calls Carnell and tells him Wardex will kill him. Shortly after this a persecution scene ensues. Once they have found refugee on her former convent, Jane asks the mother superior if God would allow aliens, to which the elderly nun replies that He would likely do so. 

Carnell is caught by Wardex shortly after this, but not all is lost. Fairchild enters the Wardex building and uses her psychic powers to deceive everyone into thinking she is one of their loved ones. Fairchild saves Carnell and they reunite with Wakefield. 

There, the revelation happens. Fairchild is shown a replica of her childhood home. She remembers that one night, she was singing "One Day My Prince Will Come" from Snow White, when a stag and a cardinal bird appeared in her room. They lured her outside, and brought her inside a very bright house. There, Fairchild realized she was inside and alien spaceship and the animals were aliens. She also found child Carnell who was very scared. The aliens placed crystals on their heads and they received their abilities, which remained dormant. When the aliens wanted to awaken the abilities, they visited them in the shape of red cardinals. Neither remembered the suppressed memories - until now. 

Our protagonists have another car chase and arrive into a Broadcast TV station. When they are preparing the disclosure, Wardex turns the lights off; but Fairchild uses her psychic powers and bring them back. This makes Scanlon give up his role as Mr. Smith. Margaret hesitates a bit about her disclosure, saying she is nobody's religion, but eventually she recovers confidence and agrees. 

Upon the gazes of millions of people who are (somehow) tuned in for the broadcast, the videos are disclosed. Wakefield wheels an alien into the area, who whispers a message to Carnell. Carnell speaks to Fairchild, who gives one last stare to the audience and says "Listen". And then the movie ends. 


1: The Abduction of the Kids


For me, the most insulting message the movie has to offer is the abducting of the kids. We are supposed to think that the aliens are "empathetic" and virtuous, despite the fact that their disclosure to humanity involved grooming children out of their homes, experimenting on them, giving them powers they didn't understood, and scaring them. It doesn't make sense, and instead it comes across as a glorification of child abduction.

Other people have also made the connection with the MK-Ultra experiments. During an MK-Ultra process, the victim is traumatized and they develop an alternate personality for protection. This personality is then forced into dormancy until the controllers need it; a trigger from the traumatic experience is then given to the victim. If someone was tormented, for example, while watching "Dumbo", a replaying of the movie triggers the person and it makes the alternate personality to take control. When the person returns to normalcy, they can't remember their actions during the time they were mind controlled. 

For Fairchild and Carnell, the alien experiments gave them psychic powers which remained dormant but awakened upon contact with cardinal birds, who were closely related to their traumatic experience. I had already mentioned that alien abductions were a likely cover for MK-Ultra experiments. 

In this case, the powers substitute the alternate personality, buy even these abilities have a connection to the experiment. You see, psychic powers are also said to happen when one develops schizophrenia or uses psychoactive drugs, which were coincidentally used during Monarch Project. Another MK-Ultra themed production, Stranger Things, has multiple characters with psychic powers who were experimented upon, in this case by the USA government. 

Even if the MK-Ultra connection wasn't planned by the directors, we are told that abducting kids is kind as long as you say you have "empathy" and disguise yourself as a Snow White character. 


2: The Questioning of the Religion


Many believers think that the film wants them to question their christian religion and leave it. In reality, Spielberg wanted them to include alien life into their religion. 

Yes, the difficulties that alien life could cause upon religious people are mentioned, but then Jane's former Mother Superior talks to her and says "Why would He create such a big universe just for us?", and this convinces Jane that aliens are not a difficulty. 

The position of the movie towards religion is not openly hostile; it is an invitation to bring it closer to Spielberg's value$ of "empathy", liberalism, and readiness to learn from the unknown. 

When Jane used religion as an obstacle to empathy (we can't save the aliens because people will doubt the faith), the movie frowns, but when she used religion to save her partner from Wardex, the movie feels happy. 

Religion is not a bad thing for the movie if you value it as a way of making connection with others. Religion is only a bad thing if those who practice it close themselves to empathy and others. 

This movie is officially Ratzinger approved. 


3: The Powers Within Yourself 


I have noticed that many people are infuriated by the ending. We never got to see what the aliens actually wanted to say. "Disclosure Day" wasn't really about "Disclosure". Why could this be?

Well, I have a theory about this. Through the movie, Fairchild receives a quasi-worship by everyone who is helped by her psychic habilites. And yet she is not someone's religion. She is not a god and neither are the aliens that come to visit, despite of what you might have heard. 

The purpose of the aliens is not to be worshipped as an external force, but to help us rediscover our hidden mystical habilites. This is also true about empathy: humans have already developed this capacity, and the role of the aliens is to help us to relearn and value it. 

Indeed, empathy (in humans) is what glues the powers together. Scanlon for example is capable of using the alien tech, but his lack of empathy makes him unable to use it correctly. That's why he looses. Fairchild on the other hand is overpowered because her psychic abilities are not hindered by cruelty. 


4:  The Revealing of the Knowledge


The theme of government revelation was explored in a fairly unoriginal way, but I still noticed some interesting things: 

The first one is that the revelation happened in a Broadcast TV, not in the internet. Many said this was just Spielberg being an out of date boomer who wrote this story for the 80's. That's true, but maybe there's more to this. 

The use of broadcast TV is a call to trust and confide in mainstream media once again. For Spielberg, the internet is a chaotic place where nobody trusts anything, while Broadcast TV united people together and it was easier to keep the ideological hegemony.

Notice also how the TV people were open to the alien Disclosure, while Evil Capitalist™ kept the alien tech for himself. Spielberg is thus showing the left wing delusion of trusting journos and scientists as if they were the sworn enemies of corporations. 

On a more metaphysical level, the Broadcast heralds a new age of mysticism that will be shared with the masses, not retained for the exclusive use of the elites. 


Conclusion 


Despite it's negative reception, Disclosure  has revealed to me multiple things. It isn't just a movie to incite the masses into trusting aliens and accepting a Blue Beam deception. It is worse, specially for those who can't see beyond the bad CGI and the corny storyline. 

Disclosure Day has a variety of symbols and messages that I didn't even imagine: 

1: It's a movie about MK-Ultra, and a possible confession by the elites that UFO abductions were a cover for it. 

2: It's a movie about allowing left-wing Boomer value$ into our religions, and to open ourselves to the mysterious, the suspicious and the strange. 

3: It's a movie about "empathy" being the biggest value ever. 

4: Its a movie a out how the powers we need are already within ourselves. Aliens are not masters, just helpers. 

5: It's a movie about glorifying Broadcast TV and the mainstream media, and a call for us to trust the government and it's words. 

Might none of the people who liked it be deceived by it, and night none of the people who hated it miss it's fearsome details. 

6/27/2026

This Is Your Church

Source: Creative Commons 

For the American Audiences: I will be calling the sport known as "soccer" with another word: Football

I'm rather shocked nobody else has spoken against this, but here it's is: 

Every four years, there is the world football cup. And every four years, the Parish Church of St. Gabriel the Archangel in Tacuba, Mexico City, is witness to a particularly irreverent expression of Mexican creativity the new evangelization. 

An image of the Child Jesus is dressed in the apparel of the National Football Team. A green T-shirt, white football shoes, a football and even a Mexican flag are dumped into the statue, and exposed to the masses. Many of them think this will finally help them to win the world cup. I beg to differ. 

Writers don't seem to agree as to when this "tradition" started. Some quote the year 1970. During those times a new cleric arrived. P. José Reyes Chaparro ordered the confection of the statue while on a mission to repair the church. 

Others place the date in 1986. Both dates are likely in my opinion, because the World Cup was hosted by my country during those years. 

According to the lefebvrist Mexican blogger Jesus Batista, they used to dress the statue with the uniform of the winning Liguilla team. This stopped, however, when the winner was Toluca FC (the "diablos rojos" - red devils). 

Reyes Chaparro said that the idea could be a "hook" for people who normally don't care about religion to come to the church an pray. 

While some conservative souls have objected to this practice, the novus ordo church has not stopped this tradition, despite the fact that this  activity is very well known in Mexico and they have the means to stop it. 

This is not to attack the poor souls who genuinely think this is respectful with Baby Jesus. This is just another example of how the new religion trivializes religion in a poor attempt to please people. 

6/25/2026

Celebrity Exorcists and their Problems

There's something seriously wrong with celebrity exorcists like Dan Reehill, Chad Ripperger, and their imitators. I have three objections against them and I will proceed to explain them. 

The first objection is their stupid tradition of asking questions to the devil. The internet is full of headlines like the following: 

"The devil tells exorcist he LOVES this things"

 "Satan told exorcist he HATES this PRAYER"

"SHOCKING: Things the devil told to exorcist that will CHANGE your LIFE"

The reason I object to this is that the demons are obviously liars and there is no reason to trust them. Even if they say the truth, there is no reason to ask them questions like a glorified "catholic" ouija board. 

The second reason I object to them is based on the fact that they never condemn the Conciliar religion. If they are so good at demon detection, why can't they see the biggest, fattest demons of them all? 

The late Malachi Martin was also a celebrity exorcist of sorts, but at least he said the truth about the Council. 

The third objection is that this industry will become a gold mine for attention-seeking clerics. There's nothing wrong with *one* interview with Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson, but appearing at every single YouTube channel to speak about your experiences with demons is wasteful. 

At some point this videos will stop being about spirituality, becoming instead the "catholic" equivalent of ghost hunting shows. All fluff, zero substance. 

The exorcists, tempted by the desire for clicks and views, can embellish their stories - even until they become undistinguishable from the junk that appears in films like "The Conjuring". If such a thing ever happens, will their followers realize they have been conned? 

None of this things make any sense to me and that's why I don't trust celebrity exorcists. Might they be brought to to their senses, and might they never make up stories like the ones from "The Conjuring". 

6/04/2026

Variety Hour

Woke Actor Hate Must Stop 

This year, another garbage superhero film will be released. Its called "Supergirl", and the hype for it is almost minimal. The leading actress, one Millie Alcock, caused a little bit of a Ruckus with some statement she made. Something about she not being accepted by the audiences for being a woman. 

The rabid masses of conservative fans online ran to the anti-woke internet to complain about her troublesome statements. Indeed, an irritated response to another mediocre attempt to push feminism. 

However, at this point, I think criticizing Millie Alcock is a veritable waste of time and we would do well to ignore her. 

Many actors crawl out of their mansions to speak some dirty politics into the masses, only to be received by an angry mob of internet enthusiasts calling them out for "pushing their politics on others". 

This was the unfortunate fate of actors like Pedro Pascal, Cynthia Erivo, and Rachel Ziegler. 

While this people are not likable, I would like to remind everyone that the pushing of "the message" is not the fault of the actors. It's the fault of the studios. 

Considering that actors are both professional liars and marketers, it's not unrealistic to imagine that their producers make them sell their woke movies by behaving like arrogant woke brats. Considering there is plenty of evidence about studios interfering with movies, treating directors - let alone actors - as the one and only asset of woke Hollywood is like treating someone's cow as the face of the farming industry. 

It's more effective therefore to ignore the theater kids and focus on the studios. And yet many of this fake conservatives are back giving their money to Warner bros and Disney and Paramount whenever a "non-political" film gets released. 


Laura Loomer Hints at Terror Attack - will there be a False Flag During the World Cup? 

Laura Loomer is quite an interesting character. Her career consists in selling conservatism to the people in exchange of undying loyalty for Israel. Some weeks ago, Laura Loomer dropped a very interesting Twitter bomb: 


Forgive me but this doesn't feel like a prediction - this feels like a treat. Since we are playing prediction, I suppose this massive terror attack will happen during the World Cup - just so that everyone in the world can see how evil Muslims are. 

While the Shi'a Muslims. are certainly capable of violence, I can't see why on earth they would like to turn half of the world against them with a useless act of violence against random football players and roaring audiences. 

Someone needs to tell the Zios that being part of a violent supremacist religion doesn't mean you are unaware that such an attack will not bring victory to your nation.

Part of Iran's propaganda front consists in attacking the elites of the west, not the people of the west. A bombing against civilians  would kill that narrative fairly quickly. 

Perhaps the Shi'a are stupid enough to waste their bombs on celebrities and rich football fans, but how am I supposed to expect that it will not be a False Flag attack? 


Novus Ordo Watch's Latest Moral Outrage is a Wasted Opportunity


Yesterday Novus Ordo Watch published an article condemning Bishop Barron for endorsing the horror film "Obsession", the reading of which made me quite angry. 

To be clear, Barron's endorsement is obviously scandalous. Obsession is is one of those horror movies with a breeding subtext. When such things are mixed together with excess gore, well, the only word I can think of is deviant. 

Furthermore, I believe any film with graphic bedroom scenes should be avoided unless one can somehow censor the offending part. This arrangement is not possible at the cinema. 

The reason for my anger consists in the fact that I know Mario Derksen can do better than this. Novus Ordo clerics constantly recommend stuff that should be avoided. This isn't the first time Novus Ordo Watch has criticized NO clerics for this. Therefore this story isn't really new. 

The only new information I got was that Obsession is an immoral movie and that Deliverance is another immoral movie - information that I didn't need and that I could have gathered from elsewhere. 

Bishop Barron has been recently involved with promoting Zionism. This abominable movement has been involved for decades in *actual* violence. They have been promoting unjust wars of conquest that will bring many to misery. And their actions are based on an apostate racist religion. Why did Mario Derksen wait until now to condemn this person? 

In my opinion, this article is proof that Novus Ordo Watch is declining in quality. Perhaps if he had used Obsession as a hook to expose Bishop Barron's Zionism, it would have been fine, but he didn't. I expect much more from the largest sede propaganda website in the world.