Will This Movie Make You Doubt Your Faith?

A few posts ago I wrote about Disclosure Day, Steven Spielberg's latest movie. I speculated about the kind of story we would be getting and it's messages. Now that the movie has been released, I think my predictions were accurate, but there were a few extra things I didn't expect. 

For example, I thought DD was going to have a large cultural impact, but now its likely to be considered one of Spielberg's worst movies (together with Ready Player One and The Crystal Skull). Many people from both mainstream conservative and normie sectors are saying the film was a disappointment and is full of terrible plot holes. I also noticed many people know the movie is just a psyop. 

This leads me to conclude that in the long run, Disclosure Day isn't going to be the most important Blue Beam movie, unless it becomes a cult classic in a few years.

Having said this, I would like to share my thoughts about the film, which is indeed full of very interesting propaganda. Today, on the Pasture of Knowledge, we will see what kind of secrets Spielberg has disclosed for us. 

Movie Synopsis

We are introduced to David Carnell, a mathematical genius who has stolen alien tech and a few videos about UFOs from Wardex, a heavily subsidized corporation.

Carnell's girlfriend Jane is held by them to convince Carnell to give up the items. Math-Guy tricks them by pretending to give up the items and then escapes. He then contacts his ally, Hugo Wakefield, and asks if he should release the files online; Wakefield thinks it's a bad idea and instructs him to return to base.

Meanwhile, TV reporter Margaret Fairchild receives a visit from a cardinal bird, who awakens within her psychic powers. Fairchild is scared because she doesn't understand what her telepathy means, and during a weather report she grunts coca cola noises and scares everyone. Noah Scanlon, Wardex's owner, sees this. He recognizes the language of the aliens and decides it's time to target her too. 

Meanwhile, Carnell shows the footage to Jane. She is moved to pity, because the aliens were tortured by Wardex; however, she objects to the disclosure because she thinks people will loose their faith. Despite being a former nun, Jane thinks faith is important for society and doesn't want to loose it. 

Carnell goes to a wheat field and sees the coca cola noises video. He is also able to understand the language and feels scared. As Fairchild grunts, circles form on the wheat field. Carnell doesn't know he is one of the chosen ones yet. 

Noah Scanlon wants to kill Carnell, and so he uses alien technology to posses Jane. He starts taking control of her. Panicking, Jane holds her Crucifix very strongly until she injures herself. The pain drives Scanlon away. 

Fairchild, who is being persecuted by the men in black, calls Carnell and tells him Wardex will kill him. Shortly after this a persecution scene ensues. Once they have found refugee on her former convent, Jane asks the mother superior if God would allow aliens, to which the elderly nun replies that He would likely do so. 

Carnell is caught by Wardex shortly after this, but not all is lost. Fairchild enters the Wardex building and uses her psychic powers to deceive everyone into thinking she is one of their loved ones. Fairchild saves Carnell and they reunite with Wakefield. 

There, the revelation happens. Fairchild is shown a replica of her childhood home. She remembers that one night, she was singing "One Day My Prince Will Come" from Snow White, when a stag and a cardinal bird appeared in her room. They lured her outside, and brought her inside a very bright house. There, Fairchild realized she was inside and alien spaceship and the animals were aliens. She also found child Carnell who was very scared. The aliens placed crystals on their heads and they received their abilities, which remained dormant. When the aliens wanted to awaken the abilities, they visited them in the shape of red cardinals. Neither remembered the suppressed memories - until now. 

Our protagonists have another car chase and arrive into a Broadcast TV station. When they are preparing the disclosure, Wardex turns the lights off; but Fairchild uses her psychic powers and bring them back. This makes Scanlon give up his role as Mr. Smith. Margaret hesitates a bit about her disclosure, saying she is nobody's religion, but eventually she recovers confidence and agrees. 

Upon the gazes of millions of people who are (somehow) tuned in for the broadcast, the videos are disclosed. Wakefield wheels an alien into the area, who whispers a message to Carnell. Carnell speaks to Fairchild, who gives one last stare to the audience and says "Listen". And then the movie ends. 

1: The Abduction of the Kids

For me, the most insulting message the movie has to offer is the abducting of the kids. We are supposed to think that the aliens are "empathetic" and virtuous, despite the fact that their disclosure to humanity involved grooming children out of their homes, experimenting on them, giving them powers they didn't understood, and scaring them. It doesn't make sense, and instead it comes across as a glorification of child abduction.

Other people have also made the connection with the MK-Ultra experiments. During an MK-Ultra process, the victim is traumatized and they develop an alternate personality for protection. This personality is then forced into dormancy until the controllers need it; a trigger from the traumatic experience is then given to the victim. If someone was tormented, for example, while watching "Dumbo", a replaying of the movie triggers the person and it makes the alternate personality to take control. When the person returns to normalcy, they can't remember their actions during the time they were mind controlled. 

For Fairchild and Carnell, the alien experiments gave them psychic powers which remained dormant but awakened upon contact with cardinal birds, who were closely related to their traumatic experience. I had already mentioned that alien abductions were a likely cover for MK-Ultra experiments. 

In this case, the powers substitute the alternate personality, buy even these abilities have a connection to the experiment. You see, psychic powers are also said to happen when one develops schizophrenia or uses psychoactive drugs, which were coincidentally used during Monarch Project. Another MK-Ultra themed production, Stranger Things, has multiple characters with psychic powers who were experimented upon, in this case by the USA government. 

Even if the MK-Ultra connection wasn't planned by the directors, we are told that abducting kids is kind as long as you say you have "empathy" and disguise yourself as a Snow White character. 

2: The Questioning of the Religion

Many believers think that the film wants them to question their christian religion and leave it. In reality, Spielberg wanted them to include alien life into their religion. 

Yes, the difficulties that alien life could cause upon religious people are mentioned, but then Jane's former Mother Superior talks to her and says "Why would He create such a big universe just for us?", and this convinces Jane that aliens are not a difficulty. 

The position of the movie towards religion is not openly hostile; it is an invitation to bring it closer to Spielberg's value$ of "empathy", liberalism, and readiness to learn from the unknown. 

When Jane used religion as an obstacle to empathy (we can't save the aliens because people will doubt the faith), the movie frowns, but when she used religion to save her partner from Wardex, the movie feels happy. 

Religion is not a bad thing for the movie if you value it as a way of making connection with others. Religion is only a bad thing if those who practice it close themselves to empathy and others. 

This movie is officially Ratzinger approved. 

3: The Powers Within Yourself 

I have noticed that many people are infuriated by the ending. We never got to see what the aliens actually wanted to say. "Disclosure Day" wasn't really about "Disclosure". Why could this be?

Well, I have a theory about this. Through the movie, Fairchild receives a quasi-worship by everyone who is helped by her psychic habilites. And yet she is not someone's religion. She is not a god and neither are the aliens that come to visit, despite of what you might have heard. 

The purpose of the aliens is not to be worshipped as an external force, but to help us rediscover our hidden mystical habilites. This is also true about empathy: humans have already developed this capacity, and the role of the aliens is to help us to relearn and value it. 

Indeed, empathy (in humans) is what glues the powers together. Scanlon for example is capable of using the alien tech, but his lack of empathy makes him unable to use it correctly. That's why he looses. Fairchild on the other hand is overpowered because her psychic abilities are not hindered by cruelty. 

4:  The Revealing of the Knowledge

The theme of government revelation was explored in a fairly unoriginal way, but I still noticed some interesting things: 

The first one is that the revelation happened in a Broadcast TV, not in the internet. Many said this was just Spielberg being an out of date boomer who wrote this story for the 80's. That's true, but maybe there's more to this. 

The use of broadcast TV is a call to trust and confide in mainstream media once again. For Spielberg, the internet is a chaotic place where nobody trusts anything, while Broadcast TV united people together and it was easier to keep the ideological hegemony.

Notice also how the TV people were open to the alien Disclosure, while Evil Capitalist™ kept the alien tech for himself. Spielberg is thus showing the left wing delusion of trusting journos and scientists as if they were the sworn enemies of corporations. 

On a more metaphysical level, the Broadcast heralds a new age of mysticism that will be shared with the masses, not retained for the exclusive use of the elites. 

Conclusion 

Despite it's negative reception, Disclosure  has revealed to me multiple things. It isn't just a movie to incite the masses into trusting aliens and accepting a Blue Beam deception. It is worse, specially for those who can't see beyond the bad CGI and the corny storyline. 

Disclosure Day has a variety of symbols and messages that I didn't even imagine: 

1: It's a movie about MK-Ultra, and a possible confession by the elites that UFO abductions were a cover for it. 

2: It's a movie about allowing left-wing Boomer value$ into our religions, and to open ourselves to the mysterious, the suspicious and the strange. 

3: It's a movie about "empathy" being the biggest value ever. 

4: Its a movie a out how the powers we need are already within ourselves. Aliens are not masters, just helpers. 

5: It's a movie about glorifying Broadcast TV and the mainstream media, and a call for us to trust the government and it's words. 

Might none of the people who liked it be deceived by it, and night none of the people who hated it miss it's fearsome details. 

This Is Your Church

Source: Creative Commons 

For the American Audiences: I will be calling the sport known as "soccer" with another word: Football

I'm rather shocked nobody else has spoken against this, but here it's is: 

Every four years, there is the world football cup. And every four years, the Parish Church of St. Gabriel the Archangel in Tacuba, Mexico City, is witness to a particularly irreverent expression of Mexican creativity the new evangelization. 

An image of the Child Jesus is dressed in the apparel of the National Football Team. A green T-shirt, white football shoes, a football and even a Mexican flag are dumped into the statue, and exposed to the masses. Many of them think this will finally help them to win the world cup. I beg to differ. 

Writers don't seem to agree as to when this "tradition" started. Some quote the year 1970. During those times a new cleric arrived. P. José Reyes Chaparro ordered the confection of the statue while on a mission to repair the church. 

Others place the date in 1986. Both dates are likely in my opinion, because the World Cup was hosted by my country during those years. 

According to the lefebvrist Mexican blogger Jesus Batista, they used to dress the statue with the uniform of the winning Liguilla team. This stopped, however, when the winner was Toluca FC (the "diablos rojos" - red devils). 

Reyes Chaparro said that the idea could be a "hook" for people who normally don't care about religion to come to the church an pray. 

While some conservative souls have objected to this practice, the novus ordo church has not stopped this tradition, despite the fact that this  activity is very well known in Mexico and they have the means to stop it. 

This is not to attack the poor souls who genuinely think this is respectful with Baby Jesus. This is just another example of how the new religion trivializes religion in a poor attempt to please people. 

Celebrity Exorcists and their Problems

There's something seriously wrong with celebrity exorcists like Dan Reehill, Chad Ripperger, and their imitators. I have three objections against them and I will proceed to explain them. 

The first objection is their stupid tradition of asking questions to the devil. The internet is full of headlines like the following: 

"The devil tells exorcist he LOVES this things"

 "Satan told exorcist he HATES this PRAYER"

"SHOCKING: Things the devil told to exorcist that will CHANGE your LIFE"

The reason I object to this is that the demons are obviously liars and there is no reason to trust them. Even if they say the truth, there is no reason to ask them questions like a glorified "catholic" ouija board. 

The second reason I object to them is based on the fact that they never condemn the Conciliar religion. If they are so good at demon detection, why can't they see the biggest, fattest demons of them all? 

The late Malachi Martin was also a celebrity exorcist of sorts, but at least he said the truth about the Council. 

The third objection is that this industry will become a gold mine for attention-seeking clerics. There's nothing wrong with *one* interview with Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson, but appearing at every single YouTube channel to speak about your experiences with demons is wasteful. 

At some point this videos will stop being about spirituality, becoming instead the "catholic" equivalent of ghost hunting shows. All fluff, zero substance. 

The exorcists, tempted by the desire for clicks and views, can embellish their stories - even until they become undistinguishable from the junk that appears in films like "The Conjuring". If such a thing ever happens, will their followers realize they have been conned? 

None of this things make any sense to me and that's why I don't trust celebrity exorcists. Might they be brought to to their senses, and might they never make up stories like the ones from "The Conjuring". 

Variety Hour

Woke Actor Hate Must Stop 

This year, another garbage superhero film will be released. Its called "Supergirl", and the hype for it is almost minimal. The leading actress, one Millie Alcock, caused a little bit of a Ruckus with some statement she made. Something about she not being accepted by the audiences for being a woman. 

The rabid masses of conservative fans online ran to the anti-woke internet to complain about her troublesome statements. Indeed, an irritated response to another mediocre attempt to push feminism. 

However, at this point, I think criticizing Millie Alcock is a veritable waste of time and we would do well to ignore her. 

Many actors crawl out of their mansions to speak some dirty politics into the masses, only to be received by an angry mob of internet enthusiasts calling them out for "pushing their politics on others". 

This was the unfortunate fate of actors like Pedro Pascal, Cynthia Erivo, and Rachel Ziegler. 

While this people are not likable, I would like to remind everyone that the pushing of "the message" is not the fault of the actors. It's the fault of the studios. 

Considering that actors are both professional liars and marketers, it's not unrealistic to imagine that their producers make them sell their woke movies by behaving like arrogant woke brats. Considering there is plenty of evidence about studios interfering with movies, treating directors - let alone actors - as the one and only asset of woke Hollywood is like treating someone's cow as the face of the farming industry. 

It's more effective therefore to ignore the theater kids and focus on the studios. And yet many of this fake conservatives are back giving their money to Warner bros and Disney and Paramount whenever a "non-political" film gets released. 

Laura Loomer Hints at Terror Attack - will there be a False Flag During the World Cup? 

Laura Loomer is quite an interesting character. Her career consists in selling conservatism to the people in exchange of undying loyalty for Israel. Some weeks ago, Laura Loomer dropped a very interesting Twitter bomb: 

Forgive me but this doesn't feel like a prediction - this feels like a treat. Since we are playing prediction, I suppose this massive terror attack will happen during the World Cup - just so that everyone in the world can see how evil Muslims are. 

While the Shi'a Muslims. are certainly capable of violence, I can't see why on earth they would like to turn half of the world against them with a useless act of violence against random football players and roaring audiences. 

Someone needs to tell the Zios that being part of a violent supremacist religion doesn't mean you are unaware that such an attack will not bring victory to your nation.

Part of Iran's propaganda front consists in attacking the elites of the west, not the people of the west. A bombing against civilians  would kill that narrative fairly quickly. 

Perhaps the Shi'a are stupid enough to waste their bombs on celebrities and rich football fans, but how am I supposed to expect that it will not be a False Flag attack? 

Novus Ordo Watch's Latest Moral Outrage is a Wasted Opportunity

Yesterday Novus Ordo Watch published an article condemning Bishop Barron for endorsing the horror film "Obsession", the reading of which made me quite angry. 

To be clear, Barron's endorsement is obviously scandalous. Obsession is is one of those horror movies with a breeding subtext. When such things are mixed together with excess gore, well, the only word I can think of is deviant. 

Furthermore, I believe any film with graphic bedroom scenes should be avoided unless one can somehow censor the offending part. This arrangement is not possible at the cinema. 

The reason for my anger consists in the fact that I know Mario Derksen can do better than this. Novus Ordo clerics constantly recommend stuff that should be avoided. This isn't the first time Novus Ordo Watch has criticized NO clerics for this. Therefore this story isn't really new. 

The only new information I got was that Obsession is an immoral movie and that Deliverance is another immoral movie - information that I didn't need and that I could have gathered from elsewhere. 

Bishop Barron has been recently involved with promoting Zionism. This abominable movement has been involved for decades in *actual* violence. They have been promoting unjust wars of conquest that will bring many to misery. And their actions are based on an apostate racist religion. Why did Mario Derksen wait until now to condemn this person? 

In my opinion, this article is proof that Novus Ordo Watch is declining in quality. Perhaps if he had used Obsession as a hook to expose Bishop Barron's Zionism, it would have been fine, but he didn't. I expect much more from the largest sede propaganda website in the world.

He's Back

0 in Subtlety 

Somehow, Spielberg returned: He is back this June with a film that promises to be a fascinating feast of esoteric symbolism, propaganda and special effects. 

This film is called Disclosure Day, and it revolves around the idea that the  Feds have hidden from us information about aliens and it's time for them to disclose the truth. 

Many people will no doubt feel excited, - it's another opportunity to relieve the 80's! . But this blog is different. We know things. And this movie interests us for a significantly different reason. 

What mysteries will Disclosure Day reveal to us? What does Mr. Spielberg, the god emperor of Propagandists, want to tell us? This and many other questions will be explored today, in the Pastures of Knowledge. 

Trailer Synopsis  

Based on the trailers (which I link here, here and here) I think I can provide a simple synopsis as to what this movie will be like. 

Emily Blunt is a woman who was abducted as a kid by aliens. They placed a tech thing in her head and gave her psychic powers. We also see a boy who holds hands with her, presumably to make themselves stronger against the ET's. 

Emily Blunt is likely struggling with her powers, like the Marvel character Jean Grey. At some point during a weather report, Emily Blunt has a brief anxiety attack and proceeds to make weird noises, as if possessed by a Coca Cola Demon. 

After the world witnesses her viral posession, she finds herself in big trouble. The government doesn't want people to know about aliens, and she is blowing their cover. 

A journalist who looks like the podcaster Dave Smith starts investigating the event, and is taken into a cabin in the woods. After seeing the Coca Cola Demon event and the apparition of a wheat field circle, Emily Blunt uses her psychic powers to warn him of an impending assassination attempt. 

I predict that both Temu Dave Smith and Not-Jean-Grey will have an "I Learned Things" character arc, similar to the guy from Close Encounters who abandoned his family. This journalist will remember that *he* is the kid who was abducted with Emily Blunt, bringing a stronger connection within them & the aliens.

The purveyor of this information will be the Colman Domingo character. He will play the role of Morpheus from Matrix, and he will awaken our heros to the truth. His name is Mr. Wakefield. 

At some point in the film both characters will develop a desire to disclose the existence of aliens to the masses. Their knowledge makes them a target because they can prove it with certainty. 

Here is were I would put the white beard guy who tortures himself with electric shocks. 

He is surrounded by a clean, soulless corporate environment. Its quite obvious he will be our antagonist, because Spielberg hates corporate capitalists. 

He will likely be working with the government. This feeds into the narrative that the Feds know that ET exists but want to hide it. 

His role will be akin to that of Agent Smith in the Matrix

My prediction is that our protagonists will teach mankind about Aliens around the last third of the movie. A big chaos ensues, but when the beings present themselves publicly and show benevolence (possibly with their psychic powers) everyone will accept them. A dawn of a new age of knowledge and ET fraternity will ensue. 

Extra Tidbits

Other things I want to highlight from the trailers are the following. 

+ Based on the behavior of the deer and the red bird, it seems that Emily Blunt can communicate with them. It's also possible that they might be hidden aliens - like the Skin-Walker witches. 

+ It seems that religion is going to be relevant to the plot. For example, we see a hand holding a crucifix: 

We also see nuns in traditional garb watching a screen in shock: 

One of them says "Why would He make such a vast universe just for us?". The idea is that if you don't believe in aliens, you are making Baby Jesus cry. 

+ We also have the eyes. In popular culture, any change in your eyes is an indication of possession (Ie., if eyes turn black, yellow, or white, you know you're watching a possession movie).

III In this case however, the metallic blue / glowing eyes seem to indicate that the character has found the hidden knowledge of the aliens. An opening of the third eye of the mind. 

Interestingly, the writer of Disclosure Day was already involved in another movie about aliens: Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. 

In this film, a soviet woman asks an alien to give her knowledge. When the beings find her unworthy, they drive her into torment and set her eyes in flames. 

+ The Coca Cola Demon scene is also very interesting, because guttural noises are also a sign of possession. We also witness her psychic powers as the weather report screen moves abnormally. 

+ Finally, I would like to comment a little bit more on the colour blue. The fact that this is the colour of those who have knowledge about aliens is unlikely to be a coincidence. 

You see, blue is the colour of the first levels of freemasonry. In a way it represents initiation and beginner's knowledge for the stone masons, just as this movie will introduce the masses to a the next era of ET illuminism. 

The Usual "Aliens Exist" Propaganda

As far as we can guess from the trailers, this flick will include multiple popular beliefs about the consequences of alien life. I want to list them here and add some comments: 

ET Exists, Therefore We Need to Change and Question our Beliefs

That's a supposition, not a certain fact. Who says the aliens aren't evil capitalists too? "Aliens come, therefore we change" This sounds like the Disneyfied version of All Tomorrows. 

Some people seem to believe that aliens could disprove some of our beliefs. I, a stubborn believer, beg to differ.

For example, some people use aliens as an excuse to attack creationism. But If aliens were to exist, they might have originated here on earth. Since the universe started out small, they were able to extend their dominion into other galaxies, only to be separated from us by its expansion. 

I mean, this is obviously just speculation and not hard science, but if the so-called Disclosure Day happens, what's gonna prevent me - and many others - from keeping our beliefs unchanged? 

I want to see Richard Dawkins dropping his belief in evolution because some dingy space slug told him it believes in God. 

ET Exists, Therefore My Infantile Worldview is Better than Yours 

This is something than Spielberg said in the trailers. That an alien disclosure would make us better people and improve our world: 

It sounds like a nice little hope he keeps to himself. He is still wrong. Spielberg has lots of imagination, so why hasn't he imagined that these alien civilizations could be literal space Nazis? 

I would like to remind him that when the Europeans and Native Americans learned about each other, neither became goody two shoes Hollywood socialists who immediately proceeded to question their beliefs. 

The Truth About the Alien Conspiracy Theories 

"This 79 year cover up of the truth has to end" - the movie

Undoubtedly, many people will leave the cinemas thinking that aliens must be out there, somewhere. I have seen some people say that Spielberg "knows that aliens exist" and has wanted to tell us ever since.

But the truth is that this "aliens exist" stuff is likely inserted into the masses for other reasons. Even if they were hiding space entities from us, aliens are more likely to be a psychological operation. 

We know, for example, that during the 1950's and 60's the American government conducted mind control experiments on people. Therefore it makes sense to believe that many supposed "abductions" are just cover ups for this types of operations. 

Many abduction survivors recount being experimented upon, subjected to invasive procedures or scary aliens looking at them as in a scientific mission. If the CIA wanted to do something illegal with human bodies, all they would have to do is find realistic alien suits. A frightened and drugged individual would be confused enough to believe ET wanted to see his intestines. 

This connects back to the film, when we see that Not-Jean-Grey has butterflies in her room. 

"Monarch Project" is an alternate

name for MK-Ultra. It was inspired by how the worm becomes a monarch butterfly - as if it was transformed through Brain control. 

Another popular interpretation for UFO sightings is the testing of new vehicular technologies by the military. 

We also have the Blue Beam Project. 

Blue Beam is basically a possible psychological operation in which the elites fake the arrival of Extraterrestrial beings for whatever purpose they have in mind. 

For example, if they want to bring a New World Order, they can say that we must unite ourselves under a world government because that's what ET wants and we have to change because he comes from space. 

The USA ZOG Empire, for example, could say that Iran or China are allied with a scary extraterrestrial civilization as an excuse to push for more wars. 

Many promoters of this theory say that hyperealistic CGI or AI generated images will be used on a Blue Beam event. I am not so sure if AI is powerful enough yet. But the era of hyper realistic CGI is already within us: a simple check on the popular Backrooms videos on YouTube is sufficient to prove my point. 

Blue Beam grade CGI can be used against small targets. For example, they can scare members of the Iranian army with a fake UFO hologram. A new Jim Jones could be deceived and groomed by the CIA with Blue Beam technology.

Perhaps in the end a Blue Beam event never happens, but I think many of those who stubbornly believe that the elites have hidden alien life from us are begging to be deceived by a fake Disclosure Day. 

In short: alien deception hides the real deal, and distracts people 

Conclusion 

Disclosure Day will premiere on the 10th of June of this year. It kinda came out of nowhere - I just learned about it two weeks ago - but it will likely impress itself into the minds of many people.

If something like Blue Beam arrives upon us, will they become the grinning rooftop party-goers from Independence Day? 

Millstone Revival: Summary Chapter

All through this series we have been analyzing some cuestionable family movie tropes and the different way in which they might appear. Considering the educational aspects of my posts, I have decided to conclude this series with a summary of all of them. So today, in the Pastures of Knowledge, I will provide a summary of the Millstone Revival series. 

Chapter One: The Self Acceptance Message

What is the Self Acceptance Message?

+ This message consists in the following premises: 

1: You are perfect just the way you are. Accepting yourself is virtuous. 

2: You shouldn't stop doing what gives you happiness / identity for the sake of others. 

3: Others should accept you just the way you are and you should accept others just the way they are

What is the Little Brother of the Self Acceptance Message? 

+ The little brother of the self acceptance message is the acceptance message. 

+ In this message, you are encouraged into non-discrimination and are told to accept others. 

+ The acceptance message is not evil per se. It's just that it is everywhere and therefore it becomes the only value for society. 

What are it's different variants? 

+ In some self acceptance movies, our protagonist is forbidden from doing something they like. They learn to accept themselves for what they like and make others to accept them. 

+ In other self acceptance movies, our protagonist is discriminated against. The character learns to accept itself and teaches others to accept them. It's about accepting what you are. 

What's Wrong with them? 

+ One shouldn't "accept themselves" if what they are doing is evil. One shouldn't "accept themselves" if they are corrupted / evil. 

+ In short: You shouldn't just "be yourself" if you are evil. It's better to be the best version of yourself. Whatever is evil within yourself is not sanitized because it comes from yourself. 

+ The be yourself message can be used to teach good things (Ie., the value of not being a hypocrite) but that doesn't mean it's the only way of teaching this values. 

Chapter Two: The Good Villains 

What is a Good Villain? 

+ A Good Villain is a what happens when a character who would otherwise be an antagonist, is the protagonist of our story. 

What is Wrong with a Good Villain?

+ There's nothing wrong with a redemption story, but the following tend to appear in this films: 

+ They are used to introduce the be yourself message 

+ Many feed into the idea that if you have a sad backstory, you have an excuse to engage in evil. This mentality is used in real life to protect criminals, independently of their will to redeem themselves. 

+ Some show villainy as something fun and cool. While the kids will not necessarily become cartoon villains after watching "The Minions", they might become nihilists who believe there's no distinction between good and evil. 

What are it's Different Variants? 

+ The Symbolical good villain is when our character is a common symbol of evil (ie., a dragon) but behaves in an acceptable way.  

+ The Acceptance Good Villain is when our character was corrupted due to discrimination. The redemption arc often involves learning to socialize. 

+ The Discordian Good Villain is a character who is just evil and we are supposed to think that their evil is funny. 

Chapter Three: Villain Songs 

What is a Villain Song?

+ A villain song is a song were a malevolent, antagonistic character sings about themselves and their motivations. 

What's Wrong with Villain Songs? 

+ In some villain songs, the antagonist try to justify themselves, making excuses for their behavior that sometimes land very well. 

+ Some villain songs are glorified power fantasies that make their motivations enticing and convincing. 

+ Other villain songs glorify evil, because they consist on a villain boasting about their malice. 

Chapter Four: Lowbrow Moments 

What is a Lowbrow Moment?

+ A lowbrow moment is any moment that includes a reference / joke about reproduction. 

What are some of the movies that have taken the Lowbrow Moments too Far? 

+ Bee Movie, Penguins of Madagascar, Show Dogs 2018, Zootopia. 

Which Movies have glorified toxic / questionable relationships? 

Belle and the Beast, K-Pop Demon Hunters. 

Chapter 5: Toxic Environmentalism 

What is Toxic Environmentalism? 

+ Toxic Environmentalism is when one tries to defend the planet and it's biomes using false ideas, or uses environmentalism as an excuse to exercise hatred for other humans.

How does it Manifests Itself?

+ It manifests itself in those movies were pagan entities will help save the planet, or when pagan entities must be saved from pollution. 

+ It manifests itself in those movies were mankind is portrayed as the beacon of unredeemable evil. 

+ It manifests itself in those movies were every single tribe in existence is conformed by elf-like people who live in perfect harmony with nature and no tribulations, till the point when its almost laughable. 

Chapter 6: Pagan and Occult Themes 

What is Paganism? 

+ Any religion is pagan that: 

1: Worships multiple gods (polytheism). 

2: Worships gods that are not omnipotent or whose omnipotence depends on something else. 

3: Worships gods that dwell within nature, or are one with nature. 

4: Worships ancestors or items on the natural world (stones, trees, animals)

How does it manifest itself? 

+ Any films where the story happens in a pagan world: 

1: With multiple different gods

2: With an energy that dwells within things

3: Where the gods are not omnipotent 

4: And when one can be spiritually guided by ancestors, stones, plants, etc.

What is The Occult? 

+ Esoteric religions are those whose doctrines remain hidden or secret. Some of this are also secret societies. 

+ I am also counting here religions that indulge in magic (the using of mysterious forces) like Wicca and Voodoo. 

+ Sometimes their practitioners mix different forms of esotericism.

+ Some examples of esoteric groups involve the Kabbalah, the Ordo Templi Orientis, Freemasonry, Theosophy, Anthroposophy and some Satanic associations. 

How Does It Manifest Itself? 

+ It manifests itself through symbols; sometimes they are naked to the eye, sometimes they require attention, and sometimes they are so subtle that only the initiates can see them. 

Chapter 7: Feminism 

What is Femenism? 

+ Feminism is any movement that seeks to protect women's welfare in an unseemly way, or due to the influence of false ideas. 

How Does it Manifest Itself? 

+ Some films are not about feminism, but contain some femenist ideas / undertones. 

+ Other films use the be yourself blueprint as a way of explaining femenist ideas. The character does something they like against the expectations of society. 

+ Many films include overpowered girl bosses, downplaying the non-female characters as the film focus, exclusively (and often very poorly) on how powerful the girls are. Many of this girl bosses can be said to be horrible people. 

Conclusion

It's very important to be careful with movies. They're often not written with out best interests in mind. 

But most importantly, it is necessary to take proper care of your children and your soul at all costs.

+ Do not be too harsh with your children, or else they will rebel against you. Even in those things you got right. Humiliations, comparisons with other siblings, and sarcastic comments must be avoided. 

+ It's not okay to ban things that were never forbidden by the Church (like going to theme parks or playing videogames) for the sake of an attempt at austerity. Be austere with yourself first before banning everything. 

+ Do not be too weak with your children. Put them limits and they will grow up to follow those limits. Pampering a child into weakness it's also a form of neglect, and you won't even like the final result. 

+ Be clear with the instructions you give, and explain the motivations behind them.

+ If you socially isolate (no friends outside the family structure) your child for "Homeschooling", you are a bad parent. Your children can meet other children at parks / extracurriculars. 

The Animal Farm Movie (Part 2)

It's finally here: the dreaded adaptation of Animal Farm by Andy Serkis and Seth Rogen has finally breached the cinemas. A military of hatred has raised on the internet, uniting everyone against this offensive film. 

As for myself, I can see that my predictions for the movie were correct. Animal Farm 2026 is indeed a vacuous criticism of capitalism made by capitalist Hollywood. The main problem for the animals is not the pigs becoming corrupted, but the pigs selling out the farm to sex swapped Elon Musk. Eventually, the pigs get defeated and everyone restores Animal Farm into its former socialist glory. 

While I have found the discourse around this movie to be boring, I was still able to pick up a few things that were worth commenting. So today, in the Pasture of knowledge, I will provide you with some commentary about this film adaptation. 

The Commentary of the Slop Right

I have seen many of the Slop Right masses repeat the "Orwell Hated Socialism" mantra; as if it wasn't publicly available knowledge that the guy was a Democratic socialist.

In fact, for every comment that says "Orwell Hated Socialism", there is a nerd saying that *actually* Orwell was a socialist. This are probably followed by comments discussing whether socialism and communism can be said to be the same movement. 

In reality and as I said before, Animal Farm is not a condemnation of the revolution: it is the condemnation of those who make the revolution about getting power. Stalin bad, Trotsky good. 

The fact that so many people are unaware of this fact is quite amusing. How many are loosing their minds over the disrespect of the book, abd yet they don't know that they themselves are disrespecting it? 

Moses the Crow 

One of the Characters who is missing in this adaptation is Moses, the crow. This omission is quite telling and is significantly important.  

In the original book, Moses plays the role of the Orthodox Church. Moses preaches to other animals that they will go to "Sugarcandy Mountain", a Heaven for all suffering beasts.

Moses is fed beer and crumbs by Mr. Jones, his master and commander. He leaves the farm after the revolution but returns and accepts Napoleon as his new master and commander. 

This represents that the Mordorox Church worked with the Czar, long before Stalin was a thing. This represents that the Mordorox Churcsh sold out to Stalin and is now infiltrated with former KGB agents. This also represents that Orwell, being a *true* socialist, didn't like organized religion. 

The reason I called this omission "quite telling". can be found on the cover for this post. Angel Studios is owned by Mormons, and the Mormons share many similarities work Moses the crow. 

Mormons are a subsidiary of the Freemasons. Mormons are a cult which means their coercion style is more abrasive than that of other religions. Mormons are one of those "christian" churches that beg for money so much that they create more disbelief than belief. 

Mormons even believe that everyone can eventually enter heaven. It's the same doctrine as Moses's SugarCandy Mountain were all animals go to heaven and no specific moral code is ever given. 

Mormon studios like Angel are subsidiaries of the establishment, just like Moses the Crow. Mormons used to beg the crumbs and the beer of the american christian masses, back when they were conservative. Now the winds have shifted, and Mormons beg for the crumbs and the beer of the judeocentric establishment. Angel Studios is just a symptom of the sickness in the LDS church. 

Angel is (Unsurprisingly) Selling Out to Hollywood 

Speaking of subsidiaries to the state, I have noticed that Angel is (unsurprisingly) selling out to Hollywood. 

The reason I call this unsurprising is that even when their one and only success was The Chosen they acted in this way. Writing Jesus into telling fart jokes is not a sign of genuine respect for Christianity but a sign that they were always grifters. 

While the 2023 film Sound of Freedom offended Hollywood, that was because the film was perceived as coming from the Qanon Trumpite Cult which has never been popular among the stars. It represented the rise of a rival studio during a year were many films flopped. 

Since then, Angel Studios has invited multiple big names into their films. To Booth: 

John Lithgow in Cabrini (2024) 

Mark Hamill, Pierce Brosnan, Uma Thurman, Oscar Isaac, Ben Kingsley, Kenneth Branagh, in King of Kings (2025) 

Seth Rogen, Steve Buscemi, Kathleen Turner, Iman Vellani, Laverne Cox, Woody Harrelson for Animal Farm. 

So whoever thought that Angel would save us from evil Hollywood was greatly deceived.

The "Sound of Freedom" Reference

During a particularly repulsive scene, the Seth Rogen pig farts for an uncomfortably long moment and then says triumphantly. "This is the sound of freedom." 

This is an obvious reference to the aforementioned 2023 film "Sound of Freedom". Let me add a little bit of a retrospective as to why this "joke" is actually abominable. 

Back in summer 2023, the release of Sound of Freedom was met with huge controversy. The mainstream left gave it a blanket rejection; not necessarily because they opposed the message against trafficking but because they believed it's story was based on falsehood and Trumpism. 

The mainstream right on the other hand received it with standing applause. I got the impression that some would accuse you of being an abuser if you dared to say anything negative about it. 

Angel Studios made big money from a movie whose main theme can't be described with words. Angel Studios and it's supporters sold the film as a bold statement against both the traffickers and Hollywood, who is full of evil people. A movie so virtuous you had to see it, and so serious that it would change the world.

Skip to 3 years later and now Sound of Freedom is the punchline of yet another fart joke. 

This just proves what I have said about the studio before. They are so desperate to become a big studio like Fox or Disney that they are willing to submit to Hollywood's opinions about their most successful movie. 

Angel Studios is led by a people so unserious that Jesus Christ, political novels for adults and even Child Trafficking itself can be subjected to flatulence jokes and it's okay because we're the largest christian movie studio ever.